On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I keen to try it! Sounds interesting. > Dido! > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Tim Veil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm up for it. > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> I have a crazy idea that I have always wanted to try out just for fun. > If > >> you don't want to participate feel free to ignore this thread since this > >> experiment will be non-binding. > >> > >> This is not the first time that I've seen disagreement over feature sets > >> and priorities. I'm sure it's happened to all of us. There's a > technique > >> that I use to make the issues plain. > >> > >> When one evaluates a solution, they usually have a set of criteria used > to > >> perform the evaluation and so each solution gets a certain score > depending > >> on how well it meets that criteria. > >> > >> S_i = sum_j C_j,i > >> > >> But of course, there's usually no agreement on how well each solution > meets > >> that criteria. What has worked well in the past is to average > everyone's > >> criteria assessment. > >> > >> C_j_i = average_p C_j,i,p > >> > >> And also there usually is no agreement on what criteria is relevant and > so > >> we let everyone submit their criteria and then we weight each one by an > >> average of how much people think it's relevant. > >> > >> W_j = average W_j,p > >> > >> So the solution gets a score of > >> > >> S_i = sum W_j * C_j,i > >> > >> It would be interesting to see what we get with regards to logging. Any > >> one care to try this experiment? > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Alan > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Paul Fremantle > Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 > Apache Synapse PMC Chair > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > -- Microsoft gives you Windows, Linux gives you the whole house ...
