I've been waiting for the code to be pushed to the apache repo but I guess I'll just take a look over at sf.net. This has taken a long time. :(.
Alex On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Les Hazlewood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Yes, it would be easiest for the repo issues if we can wait to move until > after 0.9 final. Unless I'm mistaken I believe this is the general > preference of the dev team as well to make lives easiest on both us and our > user community. > > The good news is that the timetable looks good - I released RC1 last week, > and I think I can get RC2 out this week. There might be one more after > that, depending on if any bugs crop up. > > But, so far, so good, and it is moving along quickly :) > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >wrote: > > > > > On Jul 29, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > >> > >> I would like to make a (non-ASF) 0.9.0-RC1 release tomorrow if at all > >> possible. > >> > >> I've been working lately to improve the JavaDoc, and whatever little > >> things > >> trickle in. It seems pretty cohesive thus far. Aside from the one > >> remaining issue assigned to me ( > >> http://issues.jsecurity.org/browse/JSEC-116), > >> I don't see anything explicit. (I plan on finishing that issue today and > >> tomorrow). > >> > >> Could you all please look over the most current trunk today and tomorrow > >> and > >> let me know if you see anything that should be addressed prior to the > RC1 > >> release? > >> > > > > Les, > > > > What do you see as the timetable/criteria for a full v0.9.0 release? Am > I > > correct in stating that the SVN move needs to wait on this? > > > > > > Regards, > > Alan > > > > > -- Microsoft gives you Windows, Linux gives you the whole house ...
