So I know we've been talking about using the apache cwiki (Confluence) to
generate our normal website.  Allan, where do we stand on this?  Will it be
sufficient for our needs?

I started thinking about this, and I'm a _real_ stickler for a really nice
looking website.  I want to to be clean, look good and be easy to navigate.
I'm not a fan of Maven generated web sites, nor do I like the default LnF of
Confluence.

I do however like JSecurity's current website (it definitely could look a
bit nicer though).  I'm also impressed with Wicket's website (cwiki
generated), as well as CouchDB's (
http://incubator.apache.org/couchdb/index.html), which looks manually
written.

In the last few years, I've been incredibly happy with Drupal for managing
our website.  When we move to ASF permanently, it appears that we won't have
that at our disposal.  So, my question is, are you guys OK with using
cwiki?  Or would you be ok with a manually maintained and published website?

I think my current preference is the manually maintained one.  I rarely
update the JSecurity website today, and do so only for the occasional
announcement and product release - something that would still be easy to do
in a manually maintained site environment (e.g. checked in to SVN).  For
some reason, I just don't feel CWIKI is flexible or configuable enough for
our needs, and the "no linking to the wiki" rule really rubs me the wrong
way.  I don't like that anyone visiting our website would have to know to
adhere to weird linking rules - its just not in the spirit of the web and
could be confusing for some people.

We could always link to the wiki for end-user-editable content, but maybe
the main website is developer-maintained only.  What do you guys think?
Allan, what is your opinion of Confluence and do you think it is good for us
moving forward?

Thanks for any feedback from anyone,

Le

Reply via email to