I want to rename this to SpringIniWebConfiguration prior to 0.9 final to avoid any potential conflict or confustion that might arise - it is a hybrid of .ini and Spring config really - spring config of the SecurityManager, realms, etc, and .ini configuratino for filter and url config.
The reason I make this distinction is because an (accurately named) SpringWebConfiguration can be wholly-contained in a Spring xml file, with no .ini constructs at all. The WebConfiguration interface itself mandates only two methods: getSecurityManager and getChain(request,response,origFilterChain). There is nothing about these two methods that imply .ini at all, so that means a JSecurity spring-configured web app could put 100% of its config in a Spring file and ignore web.xml entirely if they so desired. If that was the case, and we implemented a class to support this, that class _should_ be called SpringWebConfiguration. But the existing SpringWebConfiguration uses .ini constructs, which aren't necessary in the above scenario, hence my desire for the name change. Any objections?
