Hi Joshua, As soon as our mentors tell us what exactly needs to be done, I'd be quite happy to receive your help. I don't know myself what is necessary at the moment, but as soon as I do, you can be sure I'll ask for help :)
Thanks! Les On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Joshua Partogi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I agree with you Les, I think the sooner we put a release under apache > would be great. At least this will create less defects in the future > for those who are migrating to the Apache release. Is there any help I > can do? > > cheers. > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Les Hazlewood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > After I get 0.9.0 out (the last non-apache release), I'd like to do a > 0.9.1 > > release. > > The only difference is that the 0.9.1 release would be an official Apache > > release - all the license headers would be in place, the proper > > NOTICE/README files are located appropriately, etc. > > > > In essence, there would be zero difference in code or functionality with > > 0.9.0, it would just be an Apache release. > > > > I'm thinking this is a good idea because it would get one Apache release > > under our belt without having to worry about functionality - a > > test-but-not-quite-test run, so to speak. It would also look good to > have > > an initial *stable* release available to the rest of the Apache > community. > > > > Is this a good idea? Any opinions? > > > > > > -- > Commitment is what moves you forward > Persistency is what keeps you going > Passion is what takes you even further > http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/ >
