I wanted to get this done before today, but I'm on a business trip at the moment. When I get back (Monday), I'll probably have time to do it Tuesday.
Cheers, Les On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How is this going? > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Oct 8, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> That's a good point. >> >> I guess maybe a better approach is to make a release now (0.9-RC3) - >> today or tomorrow - and then do the code import into the ASF repo and >> finish the JavaDoc there? >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>> >>>> The only thing left is JavaDoc, and I've already indicated everywhere >>>> in code this needs to occur via //TODO tags. If anyone is able to >>>> help whittle down those TODOs, it would be much appreciated. As soon >>>> as they're all gone, the release can be made. >>>> >>> >>> At this point, if you have added TODOs all over the places where the >>> Javadoc >>> is missing, I think that we can inject the code into Apache subversion : >>> you >>> may find peeps at apache who _love_ to add javadoc ;) >>> >>> Seriously, perfection is not something we can reach. It's only a moving >>> target. I would rather have the code base available, so that we can start >>> building the community around JSecurity, because this is the most >>> difficult >>> task to complete to get JSecurity out of the incubator. >>> >>> Of course, IMHO. >>> >>> Thanks Les ! >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> cordialement, regards, >>> Emmanuel Lécharny >>> www.iktek.com >>> directory.apache.org >>> >>> >>> > >
