On Oct 25, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>wrote:
Peter Ledbrook wrote:
There's a lot of projects that will be java and security
eventually. No
reason why jsecurity should take the general name as it's own. I
recommend
finding another name for it. For example we could have named
Triplesec
jsecurity but we did not because it would violate this spoken
policy.
The name JSecurity has quite a bit of traction already in the Grails
community, so I think there would have to be a very good reason for
such a change.
Alex does not suggest that you change the name, but if you have to
keep
JSecurity web site alive, then we have to find another name for the
Apache
product (correct me if i'm wrong, Alex).
I'm saying a name other than JSecurity is needed.
I agree. Googling brings in a number of collisions.
Regards,
Alan
