I guess I'd prefer to focus on this relatively non-trivial, though not difficult, effort (moving to a proper trunk and renaming packages then), after we get 0.9 out. I'd like to just get 0.9 out, done with, and behind us :)
That's just my 0.02 - Les On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Les Hazlewood wrote: >> >> I was thinking 0.9 would be the last 'legacy' release under the >> existing package structure, allowing 0.9+ to use the Apache namespace. >> >> I'm assuming this would be the best strategy because folks upgrading >> from RC2 to Final probably wouldn't want to be hugely surprised with >> such a large change, right? >> >> I'm actually indifferent as to what we should do, but I'm assuming >> delaying the package renaming would be better off for after a major >> release. What do you guys think? >> > > I don't really know. I guess you have released a 0.9 on SF, and if so, > releasing at apache is not urgent. We can discuss this point, though. > > However, as I mentionned on another mail, we have to create the real project > structure, and move the code from the import directory then. (and in this > case, I think it would be good to do the renaming at the same time : I don't > think it will take more than 10 minutes with a decent IDE :) > > Any other opinion ? > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
