Agreed. However, I think that something like PropertyEditors
complements the INI builder without going over the top. It's simple
enough to add.
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 24, 2008, at 9:12 AM, Jeremy Haile wrote:
I don't have a huge problem with it, although I think we need to be
careful about where we draw the line on building/maintaining our own
Dependency Injection framework using INI files =)
I think we should take the stance "Here's a simple/quick way to
configure your objects. If you want a more complex/powerful way,
use Spring or ______"
On Nov 24, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think we should add PropertyEditor-like support for the INI
builder. Does anyone have a problem with that?
Regards,
Alan
