Yep, I read that. All I could see was an explanation on Ivy
Configurations. I'm always interested in what can be accomplished
cleanly, if at all, in Ant/Ivy but not the Maven or visa versa.
In this project's case, I think that things can be handled by
splitting the web code out into its own jar.
Of course, I could have missed something.
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Joshua Partogi wrote:
Alan,
Les already written it down on http://www.leshazlewood.com/?p=44
I must agree that the pom.xml that Ivy generated does not comply :-(
best regards,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
s/compelling/interesting to me personally/
I don't want to start a flame war... ;)
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Near as I can tell this project went w/ Ant/Ivy because of Ivy's
configurations; I'm aware of other reasons but I do not find those
compelling.
I'm curious about what problems exactly Ivy configurations solved
that
Maven did not.
Regards,
Alan
--
Not by might nor by power, but by His Spirit.
Read my blog: http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/jpartogi
