I'd be quite happy to just take Wicket's page as a base, and change the colors to be blue like our existing site. Pull in our logo, clean things up a little bit, and it will be a good enough transformation I think...
What do you guys think? On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh? We have to commit this to SVN? I wasn't sure how the website > template stuff was stored - either on a server directly or actually > checked in to SVN. > > If we have to commit it to SVN, I guess we'll have to write our own... > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Niklas Gustavsson wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Having it zipped up would be good enough, just email it to me offlist. >>>>>> I guess since the site is not really used, I can use it freely for a >>>>>> few days while I get the template up and running? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Of course - please feel free. I'll zip it up and send it over asap. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Looking closer at this, if I'm correct, the current jsecurity.org uses >>>> the default Drupal skin, which seems to be GPL2 (at least the Drupal >>>> API is, I fail to find any license for the theme). I'm not sure what >>>> consequences re-using this theme would have for the JSecurity site at >>>> Apache. For example, it's common to redistribute the site with a >>>> release, I suspect that might be impossible. >>>> >>>> Anyone got a clue? Does anyone know what license really apply to the >>>> theme? >>>> >>> >>> Any takers? I would like to move forward with this but would like to >>> have a clear understanding of if the template would be allowed to be >>> used :-) >>> >> >> Looking at some Legal mail : >> >> "On Nov 25, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: >> >>> ... >>> At issue is whether artifacts with unacceptable licenses can appear in >>> Apache public svn repositories. >> >> They can't. Only open source is allowed in Apache's public svn. >> >> ....Roy >> " >> >> It seems that if we are using a Drupal Theme, as it is distributed under a >> GPL license, then we can't use it, as we will have to inject this theme into >> svn. >> >> wdyt ? >> >> -- >> -- >> cordialement, regards, >> Emmanuel Lécharny >> www.iktek.com >> directory.apache.org >> >> >> >
