Agree it's the right move; using slf4j is fairly transparent so I'd be surprised if anybody had an issue with it.
Kalle On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: > Now that Maven is in place and things feel like they're on rails, I'd like > to revisit the SLF4J issue. > > Can we remove commons-logging in favor of SLF4J now? > > Don't worry, I'm not proposing our own wrapper on top of it ;) We could > just use the slf4j API directly in code and move on. Is that ok with > everyone? > > - Les >
