I thought a formal vote that passed was 'official closure'. I'm not aware of anything else more formal than that in the ASF.
My worry is that this project grinds to a halt again until another name is chosen. I don't think we should change our current behavior until there is 'official closure' to do something otherwise. Sure, call another vote if necessary, but we need consensus or a vote to alter behavior, no? On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > > The infra folks are asking if we can make the mailing list migration now: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1937 >> >> Unless I'm mistaken, I believe this would have minimal impact on >> subscribers >> - more of a name change or perhaps forwarding on the infra side. I think >> we >> should do this to make things congruent (wiki, documentation, etc). The >> mailing lists are the last thing to move over. >> >> Any objections? >> > > We don't have official closure on the name yet. This may be premature. > > > Regards, > Alan >
