+1 for targetting 1.5 as the minimum
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Kalle Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree (non-binding). > > Kalle > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]>wrote: > >> What should be the minimum supported JVM be? >> >> I would like it to be 1.5 since 1.4 has officially end-of-lifed as of >> October, 2008. If we're starting 'fresh' for our first release under the >> ASF, I think we should target 1.5 as the minimum given the additional >> built-in APIs (java.util.concurrent, etc) and Generics. >> >> I don't think we should support RetroWeaver anymore. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Les >> >
