Cool - the faster the better IMO. Then we can focus on the 1.0 release again :)
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Haile <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been sort of waiting around for the naming process to get resolved. I > think it'd be fine to go ahead and do it. > > > On Jun 11, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > > The infra team would also like to switch over the SVN repository asap. >> >> As far as I can tell, no-one other than me has committed code in the last >> 2 >> weeks due to the name rename, so I think this should be fine. >> >> If anyone feels otherwise, please speak up now, otherwise I'll ask them to >> change it over today. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Les >> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> Thank you sir! >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>> >>>> Mentors, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> What do we need to do about infrastructure concerning the name change? >>>>> Just >>>>> email infra@ about mailing list, Jira, Confluence, Hudson, and SVN >>>>> migration? Is there anything else I'm missing? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I've updated INFRA-1937 and put it back into the hopper. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Alan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
