Even great programmers write bad code once in a while, but what do you
except from one that has even published his misconceptions:
bit.ly/cV1mVU

Another reason why copy and paste may not be a good idea. This is
exactly why Javascript has it's awful reputation.

"I copied this code and it worked great, but now breaks in some cases,
ergo Javascript sucks."

2010/12/15 Peter Foti <[email protected]>:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Diego Perini <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Peter Foti <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Asen Bozhilov
>> > <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Peter Foti :
>> >>
>> >> > function addEvent( obj, type, fn ) {
>> >> >   if ( obj.attachEvent ) {
>> >> >     obj['e'+type+fn] = fn;
>> >> >     obj[type+fn] = function(){obj['e'+type+fn]( window.event );}
>> >> >     obj.attachEvent( 'on'+type, obj[type+fn] );
>> >> >   }
>> >>
>> >> This is perfectly example of how you can setup circular reference
>> >> pattern, which cause memory leak in older IE.
>> >
>> > Those leaks were fixed 3 and a half years ago.
>> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929874/
>> > But yes, for the severe minority who are still using IE6 and never
>> > bothered
>> > to get the update, this may leak memory for them.  As I said, there are
>> > many
>> > roll-your own approaches out there, I just picked one at random. :)
>> > -Peter Foti
>> >
>>
>> You picked the wrong example. Using the "type" and the string
>> representation of the function "fn" as index is a no-no ! Doing that
>> on the object itself make it still worst.
>>
>> I don't want to name the guy that initially wrote this but I can at
>> least say this was the worst event helper implementation ever.
>
> Yeah, I just grabbed that particular example without even looking at the
> code.  It was from a very well know and well respected name in the
> JavaScript world, so I just took for granted that it would be of high
> quality.  My bad for not looking more closely. :)
> Peter
>
> --
> To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
>

-- 
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to