Please consider the following template. Sure its a little verbose,
but Uncle Bob declare comments to be failures, so I'm trying to
obviate such failure with the identifiers $private and $public. Also
the nested closures allow all state to be hidden with $private, and
for code (e.g. $private.init()) to be executed within the same scope
from which the ($public) interface is returned.
Feedback appreciated; I merely intend on opening a discussion. Some
or many may disagree with this approach. But is there anything
outright wrong about it?
var Module = (function() {
var $private = (function() {
var $state = {};
var $private = {};
$private.state = function() {return $state};
$private.init = function() {
//console.log('$private.init invoked');
};
return $private;
})();
return (function() {
$private.init();
$public = {};
return $public;
})();
})();
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
