Wow. It's the var inside the for statement that it doesn't like.
Simpler example:
function foo( bar ) {
for( var i = 0; i < 2; i++ ) {
bar( i );
}
}
It's perfectly happy with this version (with default settings):
function foo( bar ) {
bar( -1 );
var i;
for( i = 0; i < 2; i++ ) {
bar( i );
}
}
Well, not exactly my cup of tea. I *like* the var inside the for loop, thank
you.
Benefit of the doubt: Seeing as how it's not configurable and jslint was
updated a few days ago, maybe it's just a bug? :-)
-Mike
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:56 AM, cancel bubble <[email protected]>wrote:
> function wee(){
> var arr = ['sweet',1,true],
> count = 0;
>
> //gimme inArray() if it doesn't natively exist
> if (typeof Array.prototype.inArray !== 'function') {
> Array.prototype.inArray = function (value) {
> for (var i=0; i<this.length; i++) {
> if (this[i] === value) {
> return true;
> }
> }
> return false;
> };
> }
> }
>
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
