On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Jorge <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2:26 am, Diego Perini <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Jorge <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Feb 7, 12:35 am, jdalton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> @Jorge: >> >> >> Shows Chrome 11 and Safari 5 failing at least 1 of the tests: >> >> http://jsbin.com/ipowa4 >> >> > It's quite debatable whether it's a bug to create a table with a >> > tbody... >> >> >> > LOL, March, 7, 2007 ? That must have been Safari 2.x :-))) Are you >> >> >> The poster said that the bug was old but still exists (maybe in >> >> mobile). >> >> > Yes, that's what he said. But I don't believe it. To prove that a bug >> > exists, there has to be a test somewhere that demonstrates it, a test >> > that is able to reproduce it. Where is it ? I will believe it as soon >> > as I see it. >> >> > See, for example, that Diego posted saying "Try changing the "title" >> > or the "head" elements using ".innerHTML" and you will see problems >> > arise even in Webkit. " Well, I did and there was not any problem. He >> > just didn't know what he was talking about. >> >> I am sure your pet is better then you at talking with people ! Keep >> offense for yourself please ! > > She only knows to meow :-) > >> Have you even tried what you posted ? > > Yes I have copy-pasted it from the console. > >> javascript:(function() { var title = >> document.getElementsByTagName('title')[0]; title.innerHTML = 'AAA'; >> >> })(); >> >> Does the above really work on your version of Safari ? > > Perfectly fine. > >> Doesn't that just mean we use two different Webkit builds ? > > Surely... What version are you using ? > > navigator.userAgent > "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_6; en-us) AppleWebKit/ > 534.19+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/533.19.4" >
"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_6; it-it) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/533.19.4" Why is UA string suddenly needed for a Webkit browser ? You don't believe it yet ? Need more ".innerHTML" bugs ? >> Isn't this one of the reasons you recently ditched as not a valid test ? > > I don't know. Did I? She meows better and have a longer memory :) -- Diego > -- > Jorge. > > -- > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
