Thanks, Diego
And I'm glad to see persons who interested in deep JS and can appreciate
the level of the articles. That's great.
Dmitry.
On 07.02.2011 20:32, Diego Perini wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi colleagues,
Here's the summary of the recent discussion on Twitter about the "hoisting"
and its reasons.
"Note 4. Two words about "hoisting".
http://dmitrysoshnikov.com/notes/note-4-two-words-about-hoisting/
Dmitry.
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
Great ! It is a pleasure to read your articles and see how easily you
explain things with appropriate examples.
I have written messages in forums before about this behavior but
honestly I didn't even know the correct term (hoisting), I didn't know
the real reasons behind it and other aspects you talk about in your
article.
Since I realized that this could be an improvement I always try to
only have one "var" declaration atop of each function block.
Thank you again for these insights,
--
Diego
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
