Ha awesome. Took me a minute to get it and now I quite like it.
However some kind of intellisense is usually at hand to save repeatedly
writing out the parent objects.

On 15 Feb 2011 09:16, "Sam Merrell" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi all
,
What are the groups thoughts on safely accessing a nested objects
value that may be undefined? I recently came across a blog post [1]
from Oliver Steele where he did a shortcut that looks like this:

    var person = {address: {zip: 1234}},
         person2 = {};
   console.log("Person2 undefined: " +
((person2||{}).address||{}).zip || "no zip");

This takes the place of code like this:

   if(person2 && person2.address)
       console.log("Person2 zip: " + person2.address.zip);

Does the code lose readability when done with that sort of shorthand?
Also, is there the possibility of a performance hit for creating
multiple empty objects?

[1] http://osteele.com/archives/2007/12/cheap-monads

--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

-- 
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to