On Mar 10, 9:35 am, RobG <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> So in the above case it is clearer and sometimes faster (rarely
> slower) to write:
>
> while (--i) {
> a = b[i];
> }
Ugh, that will skip the last member, it should have been:
while (i--) {a = b[i];}
or
while (i) {a = b[--i];}
or similar.
--
Rob
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
