Ok, I'm not asking about jQuery specifically. I was more or less wondering it there were any glaring JavaScript no-no's. Here is a more specific question. What is the best way to "monkey patch"? Is it ever a good idea to monkey patch, or is it better to modify the source code?
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:37 PM, RobG <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Feb 20, 6:58 am, Scott Greenfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I feel like I'm a pretty decent JavaScript coder, but I know there is > always > > more to learn. I wrote a "plugin for a plugin", > > That is, for a jQuery plugin. > > > that enhances and extends > > the core plugin's functionality. I'm not entirely sure that I'm doing > this > > the "best" way. If anyone is bored or has some free time, I'd love to > get > > some feedback from the experts. Am I doing this the best way? Is there > > anything that I'm not doing that I should? This is the best I can do at > > this point, but I want to get better, so any feedback or criticism would > be > > very much appreciated. > > It is probably best to ask in a forum dedicated to jQuery if you want > advice about jQuery. > > > > Thank you very much to anyone who can offer some criticism / advice. The > > plugin can be found here: > https://github.com/lyconic/fullcalendar.viewmore/ > > That site is completely dysfunctional in IE 6, though the calendar > seems to work. > > -- > Rob > > -- > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
