I'll go with closure, it seems to have some cool options (either that or I fudged up somewhere..)
Thanks guys. On Mar 15, 2:01 pm, Jason Persampieri <[email protected]> wrote: > Certainly not ideal, but you could always export your function (or slightly > better, library) by assigning it to the window host object. That is, in > your external file: > > window.utility_function = utility_function > > Or something similar. Bear in mind, this is not a recommended practice. > > _jason -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
