As I've said in your comments section, I think this is a really good idea. We need to get away from the old instanceof/constructor thing, and fully embrace duck-typing. This looks a nice way of formalising that.
On 21 March 2011 14:33, npup <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a little utility to help out with checking status of objects. > More specifically, checking their conformance with a "signature" that > you provide along with the check. > > It is partly meant to help out when expecting "quacker" objects to be > sent as parameters to your functions - you know, to see if they stand > a chance in your pond :) > > > I am interested in opinions on it all - the writing, the code > (usefulness/implementation/etc). Here's a link to a blog post: > http://npup.se/blog/2011/03/11/year-of-the-duck/ > , and here's the github repo with tests etc.: https://github.com/npup/ActsAs > > Thanks in advance > /P > > -- > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > -- Nick Morgan http://skilldrick.co.uk @skilldrick -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
