Yup :) That did drop the time down to 90ms
So basically after the optimization the number execution time stayed the same.I guess this change would yield considerable results when dealing with very large data only. Thanks for all the help. -Brams -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
