Umm, you're constraining #container but testing #test; was that a mistake in 
your sample code?

On 2011-05-16, at 8:59 AM, Joel Dart wrote:

> Hey fernando,
> I read that part as well, but I think those are more specific cases than the 
> one I’m dealing with.  Take the following example (I defined the width of the 
> containing block for clarity):
>  
> <div id=”container”>
>     <div id=”test”></div>
> </div>
>  
> /*css*/
> #container{
>     width: 400px;
>     border: 2px solid black;
>     padding: 0;
>     margin: 20px auto;
> }
>  
> /*js*/
> var test = document.getElementById(“test”);
> console.log(
>     window.getComputedStyle(test, null).getPropertyValue("margin-left")
> );//prints “0px”
> >10.3.3 Block-level, non-replaced elements in normal flow
> 
> >The following constraints must hold among the used values of the other 
> >properties:
> 
> >'margin-left' + 'border-left-width' + 'padding-left' + 'width' + 
> >'padding-right' + 'border-right-width' +'margin-right' = width of containing 
> >block
> 
> >If 'width' is not 'auto' and 'border-left-width' + 'padding-left' + 'width' 
> >+ 'padding-right' + 'border-right-width' (plus any of 'margin-left' or 
> >'margin-right' that are not
> >'auto') is larger than the width of the containing block, then any 'auto' 
> >values for 'margin-left' or 'margin-right' are, for the following rules, 
> >treated as zero.
> 
> But in this case, width is indeed not auto but border-left-width (2px) + 
> padding-left (0px) + width (200px) + padding-right (0px) + border-right-width 
> (2px) is not larger than the containing block (400px), so this special case 
> does not apply.  Also, visually you can tell it does not apply because the 
> margin values are clearly not zero when the block-level element is 
> horizontally centered.
> >If all of the above have a computed value other than 'auto', the values are 
> >said to be "over-constrained" and one of the used values will have to be 
> >different from its computed value.
> 
> Since margin-left and margin-right are both set as auto, the values are not 
> over-constrained so this case also does not apply.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>  
> To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>  
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]

-- 
Laurie Harper
http://laurie.holoweb.net/



-- 
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to