There are some frameworks that work like skeletons that you can build upon. But in my experience these frameworks will very quickly starting to work against you and thereby create a burden every time you what to do something. I think it’s better to try to find framework/frameworks that work like a tool/tools (helper) instead of a complete solution. Even though I know that it can be very time consuming to look into different frameworks I feel that you will gain a lot from this. Sometimes it can be good to select a “mother” framework and the stuff that’s in that family, but sometimes it’s better to cherry-pick every single tool/piece. If you feel a bit doubtful when it comes to JavaScript/Ajax/etc if feel that you should use a tool/framework and try to stick with it, otherwise it can create a technical burden to have a lot of different tools/frameworks for each problem (slides/ajax/validation). Based on your previous experience maybe frameworks like Prototype, jQuery, MooTools, YUI, Dojo, etc can help you to solve your business needs.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Sergio Ricardo <[email protected]>wrote: > whats the best approach to soft utilize of javascript? (example: picture > slides, a little bit of > ajax, and some form validators? There's a apropriated structure to small > projects? Like backbone? > > -- > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > -- Med vänliga hälsningar Anders Jönsson http://andersjonsson.blogspot.com -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
