Agreed. Combining small libraries is a path towards piecing together your own framework, over time. (Frankly, I don't see much advantage to having a single large framework, outside of a shared namespace.) That said, microjs.com is not maintained well, as there are many pull- requests pending for the site. Be sure to view it's pull-requests queue on github.com, to see what you're missing.
Also, I recommend my own framework, Flow, at https://github.com/bemson/Flow/ Flow lets write JavaScript "programs" (i.e., finite-state-machines) that change along with your project, be it large or small. There's a short walkthrough in the wiki, which quickly explains the basics. The current version of Flow is not as tiny as the microjs.com libraries, but the next version will be (and it should be out in a few weeks)! In the end, you may build your own framework. The microjs.com site is an inspiring look at JavaScript outside the mainstream. - best, bemson On Jul 25, 3:49 am, Dmitry Pashkevich <[email protected]> wrote: > Consider micro-frameworks:http://microjs.com/ -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
