Sure, that's probably true. IE6 can go die in a hole, for all I care. I'm only going back as far as IE7.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Xavier MONTILLET <[email protected]>wrote: > I mean in ie6, you should fail silently instead of throwing an erroe. > On Aug 2, 2011 10:55 AM, "Skyler Brungardt" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > My tests with IE haven't thrown any errors that I've seen -- I'm using > IE9 > > to regress back through IE8 and IE7. I did find that the rendering needs > a > > little love in IE8, as it looks like the overlay isn't getting hidden > > properly, but no errors are logged in the console. (IE9 supports console, > > even when rendering as older browsers.) > > > > Or am I missing something else? > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Xavier MONTILLET > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Well then detect it and do'nt do anything because, if I remember well, > your > >> actual code would send a useless error. > >> On Aug 2, 2011 10:40 AM, "Skyler Brungardt" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > I decided to forego support for IE6 and older -- IIRC, IE7 implemented > >> XHR, > >> > but still uses the old event listener model. > >> > > >> > Ah, nice catch on the for loops. Updated. Thanks! > >> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Xavier MONTILLET > >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > > >> >> You don't use the activex version of xhr whereas you fall back to > >> >> attachevent if addeventlistener isn't here... > >> >> You can decide to drop ie or not but not half... > >> >> And in ie xmlhttprequest.prototype.whatever > >> >> The property you store in a variable at the beginning will throw an > >> error > >> >> in old ie versions as xmlhttprequest wonlt be defined. > >> >> > >> >> And in you for loops, you don't declare the i (or j or whatever) > >> variable > >> >> with the var operator. > >> >> > >> >> I'll take a deeper look later if needed becaise right now I'm on my > >> >> smartphone.. > >> >> On Aug 2, 2011 6:24 AM, "Skyler Brungardt" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> > Hey folks. I'd like to submit some code for your feedback and > >> >> > critique. > >> >> > > >> >> > Some (brief) context. At the organization for which I work, we're > >> >> > striving to meet the WCAG 2.0 AA spec (link: > >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/). > >> >> > However, that usually precludes having many nifty CSS features and > >> >> > rich media, since the WCAG spec is fairly specific about how > content > >> >> > can be presented -- specifically what kinds of contrast the content > >> >> > needs to have based upon its color and its background. > >> >> > > >> >> > You can see some examples of what's compliant and what isn't with > this > >> >> > tool: http://snook.ca/technical/colour_contrast/colour.html > >> >> > > >> >> > Needless to say, our design team balked at having their color > palette > >> >> > restricted to such a limited set of colors. So I wrote this JS > >> >> > library to let us have our cake and eat it too. > >> >> > > >> >> > Essentially, it provides a widget on a site for enabling > high-contrast > >> >> > styling regardless of the default appearance, and for making fonts > >> >> > easier to read. I'd like to have it be as turn-key as possible, and > >> >> > there's still some work to be done in that realm I think. > >> >> > > >> >> > I have it up on github here: > >> >> > >> > https://github.com/StrictlySkyler/accessorizejs/blob/master/accessorize.js > >> >> > > >> >> > I welcome your feedback! > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > > >> >> > -Skyler > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman > list: > >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> >> > > >> >> > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> >> > > >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> > [email protected] > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman > list: > >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> >> > >> >> To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> >> > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> > > >> > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected] > >> > >> -- > >> To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> > >> To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected] > >> > > > > -- > > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > > > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > -- > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
