After some searching on the web, I stubled upon this message by
Brendan Eich: 
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-February/012893.html

Why does he want to remove __proto__ from Spidermonkey? I would rather
expect an effort to standarize this useful property. Is there any
standard replacement for it already? Are there any plans for standard
replacement for it?

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Pete Otaqui <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
>
> there are some different features you get depending on how you construct
> objects.
>
> In your example, we might discuss your Man's "privates", which he can only
> be modest about if we use a constructor:
>

Right, this could be a disadvantage. But I think that using underscore
notation for private methods and properties is already enough for my
purposes

-- 
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to