Hey, On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Martijn Faassen <[email protected]> wrote: > A smaller patch could be constructed following the same principle I > used in my previous mail to handle just logging. If we made the log > function be passed through options (if no log function is supplied, > the empty function is passed in), we could make logging entirely > configurable. This is more flexible than a lot of particular hooks to > do logging as I write in the previous mail.
And here we are: http://codereview.appspot.com/63146/show By default the javascript tests don't spam any logging to standard output; I'm not quite sure how to configure the tests so I can pass in another 'log' function (the global one) to options. Regards, Martijn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JSON Template" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/json-template?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
