Hi

I don't fully understand why you want to use and application server to
service static web pages?  My only experience (very limited) comes of using
BEA's WLS, and they actually recommend you use a dedicated web server (in
our case NES .. a.k.a iPlanet Web Server) to service static web pages.  This
said there are issues around the use of the NSAPI plug-in to NES.  You only
get SSL connection into the Web Server, the communication between NES and
WLS is via. clear text and this can be a concern to the security conscious.
But sticking couple of fire walls either should do the trick.

Simon

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 June 2000 19:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JWS 2.0 : A Few Problems


Hi, Irfan
    I think most of the application servers are built in httpd server,
currently I'm evaluating Weblogic App Server & JRun Server, both of them
have httpd server built in.

Louis
----- Original Message -----
From: Irfan Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: JWS 2.0 : A Few Problems


> Are there application servers that have a web server built in them ??? My
> understanding is that both are different components and have to be
installed
> separately.
>
> Irfan
>
> Hi there,
>
> Thanks Brevsville Administrator for your views. However, two doubts still
> remain
> unsolved. I repeat them here again:
>
>  * Second problem relates to session time-out. We have not changed the
> session
> time-out interval (i.e. the time out is 30 mins, by  default). However, if
> user
> is inactive for some time (< 30 mins), *some times*, it throws the user
out
> of
> session. What could be the  reason behind such inconsistent behavior?
Should
> we
> explicitly set  the time-out interval? Is there any other way to  void it?
> * I have read somewhere that we should not use Web Server for  deployment
of
> our
> web applications, and instead use an application server, that has a Web
> Server
> in it. Is it really so? How it affects the application, in terms of
> performance
> and otherwise?
>
> We are using JWS 2.0 with JDK 1.2.2 (not JDK 1.1.7) for Windows NT 4.0
> Server
> (SP 5) with SQL Server 7 as database.
>
> Hope to get your views.
>
> Rajneesh
>
>
>
> Brevsville Administrator wrote:
>
> > Hi Rajneesh
> >
> > I recently got rid of JWS 2.0 after a few years of poor reliabilty, in
> > favour Apache/JServ, but we did experience exactly the what you are
> > experiencing.
> >
> > The termination of the webservice was caused by three things.
> >
> > 1) more than one or two unhandled exceptions on or servlet. Add some
> > logging to your servlets and set your logging in the Admin tool to log
> > errors to a largefile size and increase the buffer.
> >
> > 2) Run JWS 2.0 0n JDK 1.2.2 or above not the 1.1.7b it ships with, it
has
> > memory leaks that kill the webpage service over time, and slows it own
> > little by little.  It is interestng to run a test on your server at
> > startup and then let it run a few days (if you can keep it runing that
> > long) and then test it again.. dismall
> >
> > 3) NT Sevice Pack 5 alowing the JREW to dominate the CPU hence starving
> > the network. This was pretty intermittant but wa a problem. Service pack
6
> > +resolved this issue.
> >
> > Also in Web Service Manage, Service tuning, double all the defaults for
> > even a low traffic site.
> >
> > We gave up on JWS after Sun got into b4d with Netscape since there is no
> > clear path to follow at this stage. Apache and JServ are unbelivebly
more
> > reliabe than JWS.. We stil hae one site on JWS 2.0 nd the others on
> > apache. The serive intervals on JWS are about 10times that of Apache,
> > simply no comparison.
> >
> > Well I hope that gives you some help.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Jun 2000 19:21:39 +0530, Rajneesh Garg wrote:
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
> JSP-INTEREST".
> Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
>
>  http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
>  http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
>  http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
>  http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
JSP-INTEREST".
> Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
>
>  http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
>  http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
>  http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
>  http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
JSP-INTEREST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:

 http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
 http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
 http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
 http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets


**********************************************************************
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This email is confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for
the intended recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying,
distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is
prohibited and may be a criminal offence. Please delete if
obtained in error. Any views expressed in this message are
those of the individual sender, except where the sender
specifically states them to be the views of
Thomas Cook Holdings Ltd.
**********************************************************************

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:

 http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
 http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
 http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
 http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets

Reply via email to