Mr. Receinto, I read your note. Thanks very much. I reckon , it is easy
to develop an application in Java , than in VC++, my opinion entirely.
Comparative ease of developement is what I commenting about.
Your answer , must please Mr. Rao, who started the discussion.
Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gerardo & Liza Recinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: offtopic,differences between java and vc++
> For now, yes, I agree with the below comment, specially if Java JIT
compiler
> is not efficient.
>
> In the future where a compiler author decides to fully support JAVA and
> introduce a native JAVA compiler, then, this is a matter of who is the
> better/more efficient compiler.
>
> For now, here are few pros of JAVA:
> - more dynamic Object Oriented behavior since an interpreter is used to
> execute or at least many services are still being done automatically by
the
> JVM (Java Virtual Machine). Automatic garbage collection, one need not
> destroy the objects, JVM takes care of destruction (assuming you properly
> remove references to all objects you instantiate). Due to being
interpreted
> and JAVA language authors' avoidance of OS dependent language features, is
> more OS independent.
> - no pointer manipulation. Object references are always used and is hidden
> to the Java programmer. Though one needs to take into account that all
> object manipulation are done via object references. This pointer
abstraction
> made JAVA a very attractive alternative to C++ since it is greatly easier
to
> understand/to learn.
> - encourages programmers to do more refined, more organized class
hierarchy.
> Through 'interface' definition, multiple inheritance issues in c++ that do
> tend to make c++ more difficult to organize can be avoided. Java langauge
> 'interface' formally defines interfaces and gives more thick dividing line
> between an interface and a class.
> - applets allow you to write greatly portable client-side modules
> encompassing WIN32 and UNIX OSes, whereas client-side activex objects run
> only under WIN32 OS.
> - in JSP, security-wise, you no longer need to write login security codes,
> this is a deployment task, whereas in ASP, you do need to write codes for
> login security features for you web pages.
> - ActiveX components are much more difficult to write since one needs to
> understand the technology and since it is not interpreted, the technology
> inventors have had problems encapsulating/hiding technology details,
> resulting in programmer being more focused to solving the problem at hand
> rather than the low-level stuff (plumbing).
> - and lot more I forgot to mention. {:)
>
> But indeed, VC++ is a great dev't environment. I think of it as this, Java
> is not a substitute but rather an additional tool in my 'toolbox'.
>
> -Gerardo Recinto
> * former MS SDE
> * author of RAMDex (in memory B-Tree incarnation)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and reference
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kunal Shah
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 9:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: offtopic,differences between java and vc++
>
>
> Well vc++ is using native interface the application build with vc++ runs
> much
> faster than java
>
>
> pamul1 wrote:
>
> > Take my advice. Stick to Java or any other tool, VC++, drive u mad.
> Cheers.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: P Sreenivasa Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 11:38 PM
> > Subject: offtopic,differences between java and vc++
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > > I want to know the pros and cons of using java vs vc++ in terms of
> > > performance,extensibility,portability and all other features .
> > > Can any help me in choosing to go either for java or vc++.
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > > Sreenivas
> > >
> > >
> >
>
===========================================================================
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
> > JSP-INTEREST".
> > > Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
> > >
> > > http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
> > > http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
> > > http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
> > > http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
> >
> >
>
===========================================================================
> > To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
> JSP-INTEREST".
> > Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
> >
> > http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
> > http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
> > http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
> > http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
> JSP-INTEREST".
> Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
>
> http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
> http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
> http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
> http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
JSP-INTEREST".
> Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
>
> http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
> http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
> http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
> http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
