Janne Jalkanen wrote: [...]
The question is: who can commit time to fix our web unit tests using whatever they fancy, if we consider that to be the only blocking factor for 2.6 release? If the answer involves any of the words "nobody", "christmas", or "holiday", I'm going to a) scream, and b) release. May be sloppy, but really - our webtests are in a really, really awful shape.
Janne, I suppose one question is permitted from the ignorant: I realize Apache wants everything to be Apache-licensed, but LGPL is hardly a problem license. Is there a *hard* requirement that everything released as part of an Apache software project be *all* Apache-licensed? I.e., is it possible we could continue to use JUnit? It's what we all know and if we were able to put any time into fixing unit tests I'd personally rather invest that time into fixing tests than learning Yet Another Software Package. Another alternative (at least for the interim) is that we continue to use JUnit but not include those files in the Apache distribution. If that's possible it would give us a window at least. Murray ........................................................................... Murray Altheim <murray07 at altheim.com> === = = http://www.altheim.com/murray/ = = === SGML Grease Monkey, Banjo Player, Wantanabe Zen Monk = = = = Boundless wind and moon - the eye within eyes, Inexhaustible heaven and earth - the light beyond light, The willow dark, the flower bright - ten thousand houses, Knock at any door - there's one who will respond. -- The Blue Cliff Record
