Hi Terry,

> (Like Florian, however, I presumed that the workflows were
> persistent - not sure what value they'd have if they had to be
> created from scratch all the time.)

that's a misunderstanding... the workflow definitions are persistent
of course, because they're java code implementing the workflow API.
Only the workflow instances' states aren't persistent at the moment,
and that's what I was presuming.

> PS: It would be helpful if any list members who actually use the
> workflow functionality (particularly in a production environment) could
> comment about their use of it.  Also, maybe Andrew could comment on any
> larger plans he has for moving it into a more central role in JSPWiki?

Well, I've been playing around with the two implemented workflows
which ship with JSPWiki already. They definitely are useful.

Just think of workflow technology as an approach towards higher code
reusability. I can imagine many use cases of extending JSPWiki in
which this API is able to reduce time and effort considerably.

Florian

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to