ok, thanks! guess it was a rather dumb question, got confused b/c was not
very sure if we could include libraries that we are not using at runtime.
I'll document it on www.jspwiki.org in case anyone is curious

regards,
jp

2008/9/3 Andrew Jaquith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> That is true... That said, there is nothing stopping us from using another
> tool (gpl/lgpl) if it is already available at runtime...
>
>
> On Sep 3, 2008, at 8:52 AM, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  I think the Apache policy is quite clear: LGPL and GPL cannot be
>> included in ASF projects.
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> recently found apiviz <http://code.google.com/p/apiviz/>, a doclet which
>>> adds UML class diagrams to javadocs, at package and class levels. It can
>>> be
>>> integrated easely with <javadoc>'s Ant task, and generated javadocs look
>>> very nice (example<
>>> http://www.jboss.org/file-access/default/members/netty/freezone/api/3.0/index.html
>>> >)
>>> so, I thought it may be can included (got it running inside jspwiki's
>>> build.xml last night). I'm only concerned about it's being lgpl licensed,
>>> so
>>> I'm not very sure if we're allowed to use it. Also, this doclet relies on
>>> graphviz <http://www.graphviz.org> for diagram generation, which is CPL
>>> licensed.
>>>
>>> So, the questions are: first, do you think this it is worth having? if
>>> graphviz isn't found, then the doclet falls back to standard javadoc
>>> generation, so if you don't want to use it you're not forced to. And
>>> second,
>>> how does the license of this type of external libraries affect JSPWiki
>>> (i.e.: when can we use them)?: in this case we are using a (possibly)
>>> license-conflicting library to generate javadocs, but apiviz is not part
>>> of
>>> them, it is used to *generate* them. Don't know if I'm explaining
>>> clearly..
>>> I'm also thinking of cobertura right know, which could be another nicety
>>> to
>>> add, but it's GPL licensed.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> jp
>>>
>>

Reply via email to