If TableOfContents is the only problematic one, we could just change
the HTML it creates - or change the CSS style. Can't you use pseudo-
selectors (:after) to make sure it clears both?
/Janne
On 8 Sep 2008, at 16:08, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
One of the problems I encountered had to do with a TableOfContents.
In order to allow TOCs to appear side by side with commentboxes, the
TOC needs to get a float:left style.
However, this implies that all content coming after a TOC, will
smoothly wrap around it.
The way to solve this, is to give a subsequent content a clear style.
The solution I propose is to give the header a clear:left iso a
clear:both.
That way the header will jump to the left margin, but still all
floated content at the right side.
dirk
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hmm... But it does create some annoying cases if you want to start
your
thing with a commentbox.
Also, it creates problems if you want to create an illusion of a
two-column
layout with a sidebar running on the side.
We *do* have the \\\ directive for forcing a clear:both. Is the
header
clear really necessary?
/Janne
On 6 Sep 2008, at 14:30, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
Janne,
This is indeed intentional. A header indicates a new section, and
any
floating boxes from previous sections are aligned above the next
header.
This implies that commentboxes of previous section will push the
header down, and not float around it.
But commentboxes inside the section (i.e. after the header) will
nicely flow to the left.
I thought this clear:both rule was already introduced in v2.6, but I
could be wrong.
dirk
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Janne Jalkanen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't know, it's the same script.
BTW, I noticed that there is a clear difference between 2.6 and 2.8
rendering - in 2.8, all the headings have clear:both. Is this
intentional?
It screws up the %%commentbox and all stuff which wants to flow
around
things.
/Janne
On Sep 5, 2008, at 22:39 , Dirk Frederickx wrote:
Janne,
Something seems to be wrong with the deployment of v2.8.0-beta-1
on
jspwiki.org. The plain editor has not been updated properly. (I
think
it is still the old jspwiki-edit.js ?)
The deployment of the sandbox is ok.
dirk
