[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12652438#action_12652438
 ] 

Janne Jalkanen commented on JSPWIKI-376:
----------------------------------------

We don't use markers, so that's fine.  As for the API, I think that the varargs 
API is a great benefit, as it makes logging code clearer.

I don't understand how that could possibly break the logger selector, or 
serialization?  It's just a class, and we pass the class name to the slf4j 
LoggerFactory directly.  Could you please provide concrete examples?

> Move from log4j to slf4j
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: JSPWIKI-376
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-376
>             Project: JSPWiki
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core & storage
>            Reporter: Janne Jalkanen
>            Assignee: Harry Metske
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>         Attachments: jspwiki-log.odp
>
>
> SLF4J allows far more flexible logging than log4j, and it would allow us to 
> get rid of these dumb log4j compatibility problems that sometimes occur.  It 
> also plays better with other applications, gives the user more power to 
> choose how to log his stuff, and is also pretty cool otherwise. The change 
> would be relatively trivial, and would probably be largely invisible to the 
> users (since we could continue shipping with necessary log4j jars).
> http://www.slf4j.org
> The license is MIT/X11, so that's fine.
> Opinions?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to