[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-38?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12659843#action_12659843
]
Andrew Jaquith commented on JSPWIKI-38:
---------------------------------------
Janne -- sorry, I did not mean to suggest you were somehow against interface
extraction. We do agree on this. Obviously, this particular discussion has
raged for a while, and occasionally precision eludes me.
You have recap'ped my counter-proposal accurately. I'd like to keep the
interfaces in the same packages (after we rename them to org.apache.jspwiki),
and not put them in a separate org.apache.jspwiki.api package, or in a separate
package tree such as org.apache.jspwiki.api, OR org.apache.jspwiki-api.
Not to put too fine a point on it, the burden on me is NOT to show that your
idea is a bad one. Because what you've suggested is a significant change, the
burden is on you to show why a separate .api package (or package tree) is
warranted. I understand your reasoning but disagree on the conclusion.
Consequently I will send out a message to the dev list requesting three votes:
* Immediate renaming of all packages from com.ecyrd.jspwiki to
org.apache.jspwiki, so that we can move to release an early alpha Apache build.
* Refactoring concrete classes (e.g., WikiEngine) into interfaces whenever
possible, and supplementing them with factory interfaces if warranted (e.g.,
interface WikiEngineFactory).
* Creation of the .api package/package tree, and creation of various types in
this package (e.g., WikiEngine, WikiPage)
I will vote +1 for the first two items, and -1 (veto) on the third with the
recommendation that we use existing (after-rename, org.apache.jspwiki)
packages. The third vote is essentially a retroactive vote.
Let's count 'em the votes. Smoke 'em if you got 'em.
> Rename packages to "org.apache.jspwiki"
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: JSPWIKI-38
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-38
> Project: JSPWiki
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Janne Jalkanen
> Assignee: Janne Jalkanen
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
