Hi All,
I have used JSPWiki 2.8 version for a while and I am not familiar with
3.0 features and development status. I decided to check first with email
before doing any further investigations.
I am not sure is it possible to do same thing other way in 3.0 version.
I checked that the modified files still exist in 3.0, but I am not sure
are those working same way.
Need:
Make end user easier to create consistent wiki pages with template page
with variables.
I found the clone feature, but I did not find similar variable expansion
as for example in TWiki.
After modifcation with a couple of lines of extra code, I can call
Edit.jsp with variables expanded in new clone page.
Edit.jsp?page=Notes%20Db%20View%20times&clone=DefaultNote&expand=true&backpage=Db%20View%20times
So I can create this kind of links in my pages:
[{InsertPage page='Notes Db View times'},default=
'Auto-generated page. Add description and comments to page <a
href="Edit.jsp?page=Notes Db View
times&clone=DefaultNote&expand=true&backpage=Db View times"\>Notes Db
View times</a>'}]
Content of page file Defaultnote.txt:
![{$backpage}]
[Edit:{$pagename}]
----
Modified files FCK.jsp and plain.jsp:
--------------
...
<%
String clone = request.getParameter( "clone" );
if( clone != null )
{
WikiPage p = engine.getPage( clone );
if( p != null )
{
AuthorizationManager mgr = engine.getAuthorizationManager();
PagePermission pp = new PagePermission( p,
PagePermission.VIEW_ACTION );
try
{
if( mgr.checkPermission( context.getWikiSession(), pp ) )
{
usertext = engine.getPureText( p );
}
}
catch( Exception e ) { /*log.error( "Accessing clone page
"+clone, e );*/ }
//**********************************************************//
//Adding parameter expand to url with clone variables like
{$pagename},... are expanded
//Note variables are plain {$name} without []-characters
//by Jukka Karvanen
String expand = request.getParameter( "expand" );
if( expand != null )
{
usertext=engine.getVariableManager().expandVariables(context
,usertext);
}
//**********************************************************//
}
}
%>
-------
What you think is this feasible also for 3.0 version?
Jukka
