Yes, do you have a few more details on how to implement, should it be stored in a special page, or something else. Maybe some skeleton or sample code could give a jump start.
regards, Harry 2009/8/30 Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]> > > For 3.0, it might be nice to store the contents in the repository as > opposed to the work directory. That way you don't lose it accidentally if > you empty the workdir or move the machine or something. Workdir is supposed > to be a place for things which can be recovered... > > /Janne > > > On 30 Aug 2009, at 13:11, Harry Metske wrote: > > The Plugin is in the core now for 2.8. >> I'm working on the 3.0 version, but it requires some more adjustments >> (like >> replace oro regexp with Java 5 regexp). >> >> regards, >> Harry >> >> 2009/8/26 Harry Metske <[email protected]> >> >> Hi, >>> Andre has sent a signed ICLA to ASF's secretary. >>> So I'd like to add this plugin to the core. >>> I will add some testcases and hope to commit it somewhere next week if >>> there aren't any objections. >>> >>> regards, >>> Harry >>> >>> 2009/8/12 Harry Metske <[email protected]> >>> >>> I sent Andre a direct email, and got an out-of-office reply, we should >>> wait >>> >>>> a couple of weeks still. >>>> regards, >>>> Harry >>>> >>>> >>>> 2009/8/9 Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>>> An improvement would be that it could also listen to the >>>>> WikiEngineEvent.SHUTDOWN to be on the safe side. >>>>> >>>>> Is Andre on this list? Would you mind contributing your code to us? >>>>> >>>>> /Janne >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 9 Aug 2009, at 11:59, Harry Metske wrote: >>>>> >>>>> the plugin spawns a separate thread when it first initializes (using a >>>>> >>>>>> static var).The thread saves the in-memory counts to a file each 5 >>>>>> minutes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Harry >>>>>> >>>>>> 2009/8/9 Florian Holeczek <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't believe either it would be too late to integrate in 2.8, >>>>>>> since >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it would be just a new plugin and does not change existing APIs in >>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>> way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ok, fine then! :-) Was thinking of the policy to only integrate >>>>>>> bugfix >>>>>>> code into a stable branch, but indeed, it's a non-invasive change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (Note, however, that there's still a good reason to store page view >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> counts in a separate file: performance. Having a database write >>>>>>>> (possibly several) for each read would be very heavy. Better to >>>>>>>> journal it and keep a latest count in memory; then upon startup read >>>>>>>> the journal back in. JCR does not have the concept of appending to >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> Property either.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> AFAIK this is just the way Andre has implemented it :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> regards >>>>>>> Florian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
