nope, not recommended in the priha Changelog 0.5, also the test results are not better :-(quite a bit more errors and failures.
Harry 2009/10/12 Harry Metske <[email protected]> > I almost checked in that priha version yesterday :-) > Should I wait, or commit that one in ? > > I kept some test-stats BTW: > http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/jspwiki-testresult.html > (you can see the good results from Andrew's work the last few days) > > > regards, > Harry > > 2009/10/12 Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]> > > >> Yup, this is a known problem in 0.3.2... Should be fixed in the current >> trunk. >> >> /Janne >> >> >> On Oct 12, 2009, at 07:48 , Andrew Jaquith wrote: >> >> Janne, I'm digging into more bugs... >>> >>> The page-renamer tests haven't worked for a while. I think I know why. >>> >>> ContentManager.renamePage(WikiContext, fromPage, toPage) has a bug. >>> Specifically, after this code executes: >>> >>> getCurrentSession().move( getJCRPath( fromPage ), >>> getJCRPath( toPage ) ); >>> getCurrentSession().save(); >>> >>> ...fromPage is still accessible after this point. I.e., >>> engine.getPage(fromPage) returns a valid page. Moreover, it shares the >>> same JCR UUID as the toPage. That would suggest that something isn't >>> getting cleaned up properly inside of Priha SessionImpl.move(). >>> >>> Of the 18 failing PageRenamerTest tests, fixing this bug would >>> probably get rid of 15 of them. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Andrew >>> >> >> >
