On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Florian Holeczek <flor...@holeczek.de> wrote:
> Our community likes the 2.8 series for its stability and simplicity. > Therefore, maintaining the 2.8 branch at least for a longer while is > something that really makes sense. 2.8 is great. It's a reliable work-horse. I like the file based storage. Why not take the radical step, throw the 3.0 branch away, go on with 2.8 and make it Apache-ready? I never understood, why a wiki, where the wiki engine does the gui, would need a web framework. It should suffice to refactor 2.8 to use a controller servlet. And reread Joel Spolsky: Things You Should Never Do http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html 8-) Juergen
