I would rename the 2.8 with renamed packages as 2.9, simply because all plugins just broke, and doing a minor revision upgrade does not usually imply such an incompatibility.
/Janne On Jan 25, 2012, at 22:03 , mets...@apache.org wrote: > Author: metskem > Date: Wed Jan 25 20:03:20 2012 > New Revision: 1235891 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1235891&view=rev > Log: > 2012-01-25 Harry Metske <mets...@apache.org> > > * 2.8.5-svn-10 > > * the decision was made to candidate 2.8 for graduation instead of > 3.0, this is the first wave > > * package rename com.ecyrd.jspwiki => org.apache.wiki > > * moved a couple of (test) classes to other packages > > * add copyright templates to some test sources > > * remove remaining author tags > > > > [This commit notification would consist of 55 parts, > which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
