Hi, just added some comments there. Regarding the clean target + hsqldb shutdown, I'll take a look at it this week [1], plus downloading the jars from Central (whenever is possible), to avoid having a big libs folder in our svn. No need to have this in the 3rd rc, but I'd like to have this before graduating
br, juan pablo [1]: the clean target should be a no-brainer, for hsqldb I was thinking of pulling from build.xml into the appropiate setUp/tearDown methods, in order to ensure it gets properly closed. On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Florian Holeczek <flor...@holeczek.de>wrote: > Thanks Janne, > > true, I had already written down some notes on that before. There's pretty > much to clean and simplify in our build process. But it's obviously been > good enough until now, so that can wait till after graduation, I'd think. > > However, I'm wondering whether the library handling introduced in > JSPWIKI-738 could lead to problems later on. I've added some notes in JIRA. > > Regards > Florian > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com> > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. August 2012 13:20:59 > Betreff: Re: 3rd RC? > > > Okay, got it building. Artifacts are now again at > http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/ > > The problem is that the ant scripts (nor ant clean) don't seem to do a > proper cleanup. I don't check out a clean copy, I just svn switch my > working copy around, and since ant clean doesn't really clean everything, > old stuff is still out there. For example, hsqldb is not properly > terminated at the end of run nor by ant clean. > > By running "svn status" and manually removing all the files that were > autogenerated I can rebuild it without problem. > > /Janne > > On Jul 29, 2012, at 23:47 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > done a fresh checkout from rc3 and could finish the ant clean signeddist > > without problems > > > > > > br, > > juan pablo > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Janne Jalkanen < > janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com>wrote: > > > >> > >> checked out the rc3, ant signeddist, no worky. > >> > >> On Jul 26, 2012, at 00:42 , Florian Holeczek wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Janne, > >>> > >>> just tried it again with JDK 1.5.0_22 on Linux and JDK 1.6.0_33 on > >> Windows. Both are working fine. > >>> > >>> Name Status Type Time(s) > >>> testIfPluginUserAllowed Success 0.946 > >>> testIfPluginUserNotAllowed Success 0.126 > >>> testIfPluginIPAllowed Success 0.083 > >>> testIfPluginIPNotAllowed Success 0.115 > >>> > >>> These tests will fail on older versions of JSPWiki (see JSPWIKI-737). > Is > >> v2.9.0-incubating-9 running in your test environment? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Florian > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > >>> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com> > >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 21:15:11 > >>> Betreff: Re: 3rd RC? > >>> > >>> > >>> D'oh... I'd roll a new release but I've got failing unit tests > >> (IfPluginTest). > >>> > >>> /Janne > >>> > >>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 10:39 , Florian Holeczek wrote: > >>> > >>>> Now that's funny: What should have avoided confusion obviously led to > >> confusion :-) > >>>> > >>>> Janne, these are the old artifacts! > >>>> > >>>> Juan Pablo renamed tags/jspwiki_2_9_0 to > >> tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc2. > >>>> The current one is still tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3! > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> Florian > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > >>>> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com> > >>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>>> Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2012 21:32:02 > >>>> Betreff: Re: 3rd RC? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Artifacts now at http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/ > >>>> > >>>> /Janne > >>>> > >>>> On Jul 23, 2012, at 01:20 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi! > >>>>> > >>>>> I've just renamed rc2 to avoid confusion. > >>>>> > >>>>> 2.9.0 should be real near now :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> br, > >>>>> juan pablo > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Florian Holeczek < > >> flor...@holeczek.de>wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Done! The tag is named jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards > >>>>>> Florian > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > >>>>>> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com> > >>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>>>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Juli 2012 21:38:20 > >>>>>> Betreff: Re: 3rd RC? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Just tag it and I'll build it from that tag :-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> /Janne > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Jul 22, 2012, at 20:46 , Florian Holeczek wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd consider 2.9.0-incubating-9 to be the third RC. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>> Florian > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > >>>>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>>>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Juli 2012 00:05:03 > >>>>>>> Betreff: 3rd RC? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> couple of days ago I was finally able to solve my problems > regarding > >> the > >>>>>>> Lucene exceptions, as sad as it looks, in the most ancient > >> windows-way: > >>>>>>> rebooting (computer at home is up 99% of the time..). So I was > >> feeling > >>>>>> now > >>>>>>> would be a good moment to push a new RC, hoping that this time it > >> will > >>>>>>> become the first ASF release. Before doing that however, I was > >> thinking > >>>>>> of > >>>>>>> pushing a coulpe of small changes: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - upgrading commons-lang to commons-lang3: aside from the code, > this > >>>>>> could > >>>>>>> imply upgrading other commons-* libraries, if they do depend on > >>>>>>> commons-lang and don't know if that would cause to 3rd party > >> plugins, if > >>>>>>> they do depend on that library. Another possibility could be simply > >>>>>> upgrade > >>>>>>> commons-lang to 2.6, which is the latest from 2.x and most probably > >> won't > >>>>>>> break anything. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - a small refactor on LuceneSearchProvider (#1), mainly lines > >> 505-530, to > >>>>>>> retrieve and close Lucene indexes. Have that small change from days > >> ago, > >>>>>>> when I was pursuing ghosts; the functionally of the class remains > >> exactly > >>>>>>> the same, it's just a bit tinier. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> WDYT? Does anyone want to push in (or get pushed in) any other > thing > >>>>>> before > >>>>>>> making the next RC? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> br, > >>>>>>> juan pablo > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [#1] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/coverage_2.9.0-incubating-3/org.apache.wiki.search.LuceneSearchProvider.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> > >> > >