Considering that even 1.8 is over two years old (and 1.7 is from 2006), I think it's a safe upgrade :)
/Janne On 9 Oct 2012, at 00:10, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > Hi, > > just committed the change. The rat-report task creates the report at > $trunk/doc/rat/rat.txt > > I'm still playing with it in order to get all the required changes in one > go, but feel free to experiment and commit in the meantime. Also, the clean > target takes care of this new dir. > > This task requires at least Apache Ant 1.7.1, though. I haven't updated the > requirements to use at least this version of Ant because this report isn't > strictly part of the main build, but I'm not totally convinced we should > leave it as is now.. WDYT? > > > br, > juan pablo > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Florian Holeczek <flor...@holeczek.de>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> a review during the release vote on general@i.a.o brought up some >> problems with missing headers, please see below. >> Maybe it makes sense to integrate a RAT run into the build script, if >> feasible. >> >> Regards >> Florian >> >> >> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating >> Datum: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 14:53:47 -0700 >> Von: Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> >> Antwort an: gene...@incubator.apache.org >> An: gene...@incubator.apache.org >> >> Hi Christian, >> >> Thanks for the review of the release. >> >> On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> i'm sorry to -1 your release :-( >>> >>> Please see: >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers >> >> This is a very important document to read and understand. The jspwiki >> headers are non-standard and should be rewritten to conform. In >> particular, there should be no extraneous verbiage before the >> "Licensed to..." text. No copyright, no other information. >>> >>> I have found a lot of code like in the the src package /src/webdocs/ >>> Captcha.jsp >>> which are missing header licenses. I saw it is in the .java files, but >>> they should be basically in every file we release (including jsp) >> >> I agree, .jsp files need the Apache license header just as .java files >> do. >>> >>> Also export.sh misses headers. >>> >>> In the headers of the .java files is: JSPWiki - a JSP-based WikiWiki >>> clone. >>> Not sure if this is a blocker, but you should use the full name >>> "Apache JSPWiki" instead of only "JSPWiki". Personally I would get rid >>> of this line actually, but i think it is up to you. >> >> Getting rid of the line is probably the easiest way to conform. >>> >>> Example: >>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3/src/org/apache/catalina/util/HexUtils.java >>> >>> I have not tested signatures yet. >>> >>> In other projects sometimes the website is being voted on together >>> with the releases. Is it not the case with JSPWiki? >> >> I don't know that I've ever voted on a web site release. Other >> projects just update the web site as needed, with no vote. >>> >>> On another note, I agree with Ross. Your mentors should have told you >>> that and they should have voted already. >> >> This first release has been a long time coming, and I was distracted >> the last couple of weeks. >> >> I agree that the mentors should review the release and advise of >> remedial action. >> >> I'd like to see a rat report on the release. I believe that analysis >> of the rat report will reinforce the comments that Christian and I made. >> >> Regards, >> >> Craig >> >> >>> Not sure if how the overall >>> situation on your daily project life is. If you feel that you would >>> need more mentor support, please write a separate e-mail to this list. >>> I have only looked at this e-mail as it was open for a couple of days >>> without much responses. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Christian >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez >>> <juanpa...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as >>>> Apache >>>> JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating. >>>> This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer >>>> mailing >>>> list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and >>>> passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC): >>>> >>>> Janne Jalkannen* >>>> Florian Holeczek* >>>> Harry Metske* >>>> Andrew Jaquith* >>>> Dirk Frederickx* >>>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez* >>>> Fabian Haupt >>>> Michael Gerzabek >>>> Christophe Dupriez >>>> Roberto Venturi >>>> >>>> We need at least 3 IPMC votes. >>>> >>>> This release fixes the following issues: >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521 >>>> >>>> Source and binary files: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/ >>>> >>>> The tag to be voted upon: >>>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3 >>>> >>>> JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS >>>> >>>> >>>> Please download, test, and vote by 72 hours from now. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> juan pablo >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>> https://www.timeandbill.de >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> Craig L Russell >> Architect, Oracle >> http://db.apache.org/jdo >> 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> >>
