2010/5/25 Hemligt Namn <[email protected]> > Hello again, > > Sorry about my previous letter. I checked version numbers in SVN and > I realize there is no version 3.1 anywhere. And that 3.0 is currently being > developed in trunk. > > (Don't know why I thought 3.0 and 3.1 had been released. > Perhaps looking at version numbers from some other open source project > messed up my memory.) > > So only one question remains: Is trunk very unstable? >
Yes, the trunk is very unstable, don't use it. > Or would it be reasonable to use trunk now, > since then I won't need to upgrade to 3.0 once it's released. > Use 2.8 for now, 3.0 is quite a big change compared to 2.8, Stripes is being incorporated and we are switching to a JCR backend. Both are not yet finished, and there are no firm plans for a release that works. > Regards, Magnus > > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Hemligt Namn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi JSP people! > > > > How stable is 3.0 and 3.1 and trunk? Would you recommend using them > > instead of 2.8.3? > > > > The Web page http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/JSPWikiDownload > > says: "Current stable release : 2.8.3", > > and in SVN there are versions 3.0 and 3.1. > > Are they unstable, or is the Web page a little bit out of date ? > > > > The Web page says, concerning the trunk: "the code is broken". Is this > still so? > > > > I would be using JSPWiki in a test / development environment the next > > few months / half year. > > So if 3.X is only-a-little-bit-unstable then 3.X might be better for > > me, than a very stable 2.8.3, > > since I won't need to upgrade from 2.8.3 to 3.X if I start with 3.X. > > > > Regards, Magnus > > >
