My priority is not about templates compatibility. I just want to automate
the upgrading process.
I guess I don't get why the release notes seem to suggest going from new to
old on release
changes but from old to new on version switches. There might be some real
good reason for merging from new to old on new releases but I can't think of
any...especially with tools like ant.



On 9/27/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Correct.
>
> The big thing is that the default template changed completely between
> 2.4 and 2.6, so this is a difficult way.
>
> However, since the JSP tags were not changed that much, any 2.4-
> compliant template should still work in 2.6.  However, you obviously
> lose all the cool stuff.  But it should still work (and let me know
> if it does not).
>
> /Janne
>
> On 27 Sep 2007, at 18:03, Eric Ladner wrote:
>
> > Crap.. Hit the wrong button...   Sorry for the short post below.
> >
> > If you followed the rules below, you just need to compare the
> > differences between major chunks of any of the jsp's you've modified
> > in your template directory (assuming that you like your template
> > structure and look/feel).   Any major changes in the 2.6 templates
> > might require some adjustment to your template, but nothing that
> > couldn't be synced up in a day, I'd think.
> >
> > On 9/27/07, Eric Ladner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> If you followed Janne's rules
> >>
> >> On 9/26/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Rule #1 on template writing: create your own template directory, and
> >>> put your modified files in there.  Do not modify the default
> >>> template.
> >>>
> >>> Rule #2: put only modified files in your own template directory (and
> >>> CSS).  JSPWiki will check your template directory for any given JSP
> >>> file, and if that does not exist, it'll try to use the one from the
> >>> "default" directory.  So you can change your entire layout by simply
> >>> adding your own ViewTemplate.jsp file, nothing more.
> >>>
> >>> All template files have changed between 2.4 and 2.6.
> >>>
> >>> /janne
> >>>
> > --
> > Eric Ladner
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the Jspwiki-users mailing list, in which we discuss the
> > stable release (even-numbered, 2.4.x, 2.6.x), and user-issues.
> > For development discussion, please join jspwiki-dev.
> > http://ecyrd.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jspwiki-users
> > http://www.jspwiki.org/JSPWikiMailingList
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Jspwiki-users mailing list, in which we discuss the
> stable release (even-numbered, 2.4.x, 2.6.x), and user-issues.
> For development discussion, please join jspwiki-dev.
> http://ecyrd.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jspwiki-users
> http://www.jspwiki.org/JSPWikiMailingList
>
_______________________________________________
This is the Jspwiki-users mailing list, in which we discuss the 
stable release (even-numbered, 2.4.x, 2.6.x), and user-issues. 
For development discussion, please join jspwiki-dev.
http://ecyrd.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jspwiki-users
http://www.jspwiki.org/JSPWikiMailingList

Reply via email to