Hi I have two ideas that could improve jsynthlib.
One, easier to do is implementing randomization of patches. It would be not much work, as we already have all parameter ranges for patches where there are PatchEditors present. There could be two options - randomize all parameters, or only parameters designated by programmer (because some parameters should not be randomized). I think it would be great editing patches starting from some weird sounds and polish them to be "listenable" ;-) I have such option in my Waldotf MicroQ and I think it would be great to have this on any of my synths :-) What do you think? Could it be implemented as a part of ongoing code refactoring? Second idea is more complicated and to be honest I have no idea how to realize it :-D But It would be great to be able to translate patches between synths, at least to some extent. Let's assume that we have synth A with a filter where we can edit cutoff freq from say 100 Hz (midi hex value 0x00) to 1000 Hz (0xFF) and synth B wih filter cutoff from 10 Hz (0x00) to 500 Hz (0x7F). So 0x28 would be 200 Hz on synth A, and on synth B it would be 0x17 and we could translate patches this way. Of course 10Hz (0x00) on B couldn't be translated to A, and we would be forced to use 50 Hz. And there is also a problem with FM and Wavetable synths, but idea is tempting, isn't it? ;-> cheers Maciek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Jsynthlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsynthlib-devel
